
An Epic Failure and a Major Problem for NATO
The catastrophic export control failures of both the Netherlands and E.U. mean this challenge must now be addressed by other approaches available to NATO nations.

The catastrophic export control failures of both the Netherlands and E.U. mean this challenge must now be addressed by other approaches available to NATO nations.

Ukraine serves as a global case study in how modern defense technology must be designed, tested and deployed to remain effective in high-intensity conflict.

The challenge is ensuring commercial electronics can be scaled, surged and, most importantly, trusted as one element within a national strategy.

Addressing concerns about the V-22 Osprey is a necessity. But so is preserving a platform unlike any other in the U.S. inventory.

The military’s zero trust approach redefines security principles with a focus on drastically reducing attack surfaces.

Successful defense across land, sea, air, space and cyberspace depends on technology that can perform reliably across multiple domains and with limited connection.

As the volume of data fed into artificial intelligence models increases and its velocity accelerates, the attack surface grows.

The manufacturing boom won’t materialize without greater effort by private industry, government agencies, educational institutions and non-profits.

Three critical elements must be considered to ensure the architecture is both viable for the short term and flexible for the long term.

Golden Dome isn’t just about intercepting enemy weapons. It’s also about modernizing the civilian systems that millions of Americans rely on every day to fly safely.

The essential question is, will China take a decisive lead over the U.S. in commanding the spectrum in future warfare?

As the Pentagon works to operationalize AI and data at scale, generative AI is driving efficiency and mission-readiness across the military services.

Certain functions are by nature or necessity best handled by government, such as safety-critical airspace operations.

When compared with similar and more expensive U.S. warships, foreign vessels have come up remarkably short in combat capability.

The Department of Defense has an opportunity to rethink its traditional approach to protecting operational technology systems.

Applying the zero trust approach to information technology is familiar territory, but applying it to operational technologies is fundamentally different—and far more complex.

It’s time to fix the frigate, and produce it in numbers, even at the expense of the larger DDG, and pair all manned combatant ships with unmanned “sidekicks.”

But several recent developments should lead policymakers to rethink the wisdom or feasibility of clearing a “pipeline” from this critical band for 5G expansion.

The past months have shown that the Trump administration is more than willing to upend precedent, conventional wisdom and relationships to secure a “better deal” for America.

The Modular Open Systems Approach to aircraft design emphasizes the use of modular components with standardized interfaces. This allows for easier upgrades, maintenance and integration of new technologies over time.

While Russia seeks Ukraine’s subjugation in Europe and the People’s Republic of China looms as a rising danger to Taiwan across the sea in the Pacific, the military dimensions of space have grown ever more important.

A number of severe readiness challenges continue to affect the Navy, in terms of its vanishing cruiser force, crippling redesign of the Constellation-class frigate, poor readiness of the amphibious fleet and problems with the Landing Ship Medium program.

Prioritizing an effective electronic health records system is central to protecting veterans and ensuring they receive the care they have earned.

The Navy may need to produce prototypes and deploy them to combat zones like the Red Sea in order to make rapid decisions in shipbuilding acquisition.

The United States has ceded its leadership position in space-based positioning, navigation and timing, with stark ramifications for most all U.S. critical infrastructures and the U.S. military.

The U.S. must conduct aggressive on hypersonic and counter-hypersonic weapons, especially since adversaries have adopted precisely this mindset. A risk-averse mentality that demurs on military development will lose the United States the next war.

The Navy has had long-established conventions for naming ships. But the Navy has increasingly named warships for living people, including political figures, which has become a divisive issue. The next Navy secretary needs to get control of the dysfunctional naming process and restore a sense of order.

The escalating frequency and intensity of wildfires demands something new to combat them — a wholesale embrace of the most powerful technology available: military-grade artificial intelligence.

President-elect Trump and his national security team want change in the U.S. military. They can score fast wins by correcting major defense program mistakes made by the Biden administration.

Americans face a pivotal choice at the ballot box that will shape the future of our nation’s veterans.