Defense Opinion is the essential non-partisan outlet for commentary on national security, defense spending and weapons systems. Learn More
Protection from a nuclear explosion in space would be pointless because physics, geography, economics and strategic realities overwhelmingly favor the attacker.
Reform is necessary. Repeal would be strategic malpractice.
Justin Sanchez • July 5, 2026
Elevating AI and chips to national priorities is essential, but it’s also time to give biotechnology and biosecurity the same strategic focus. The U.S. should stop treating biosecurity as a low-visibility, high-impact endeavor and recommit to biotechnology as a launchpad for economic prosperity, with biosecurity as the guardrails that keep us accelerating in the right direction into the future.
The approach allows for the adoption of new technologies faster, less dependence on a single vendor, and it keeps operations running as requirements evolve.
The experience in Israel provides real-world examples for other nations of how to manage mass-casualty threats from the latest dangers.
Artificial intelligence systems improve the speed and consistency of outputs, which is valuable in the right context but dangerous in the wrong one.
What was once among the most trusted institutions in American public life has seen its standing erode in tandem with the broader collapse of institutional trust.
The nation needs more young people prepared for the quantitative demands of engineering, cyber, artificial intelligence, data science, logistics, advanced manufacturing and other fields that underpin U.S. military strength.
Had the system been in place for Epic Fury, Kuwaiti operators would have been working from the same fused air picture as every other coalition element.
Subscribe to receive our commentaries as they are published.