
Beyond Compliance: Securing U.S. Defense Batteries
“NDAA compliant” does not necessarily mean a supply chain is secure from disruption.
Defense Opinion is the essential non-partisan outlet for commentary on national security, defense spending and weapons systems. Learn More

“NDAA compliant” does not necessarily mean a supply chain is secure from disruption.

We are compounding the defense industrial base vulnerability by awarding high school diplomas that overstate students’ readiness in math.
Justin Sanchez • July 5, 2026
Elevating AI and chips to national priorities is essential, but it’s also time to give biotechnology and biosecurity the same strategic focus. The U.S. should stop treating biosecurity as a low-visibility, high-impact endeavor and recommit to biotechnology as a launchpad for economic prosperity, with biosecurity as the guardrails that keep us accelerating in the right direction into the future.

When multiple software agents work together, what are they allowed to do before a human must step in? The military already has an emerging answer.

An administration that seeks to rehabilitate Russia at this moment in time simply doesn’t understand core U.S. national security interests.

The United States and its allies should meet directly with the NCRI leadership and evaluate the third option.

The reality of 2026 and the array of current and evolving threats demand that our procurement cycles speed up dramatically.

Adversaries now consider commercial satellite communications infrastructure to be fair game during conflict.

The Iran conflict and targeted tariffs welcome in a new age of U.S. defensive readiness, reshoring defense production while simultaneously increasing productive scale.
Subscribe to receive our commentaries as they are published.